Platform
Turn business data into clear dashboards, shared metrics, and reporting your teams can trust.
Platform names describe tools we work with. Not a partnership or certification list.
Contact UsContact us for a Free Assessment. We'll follow up within 2 business days. See a sample Free Assessment.
Finance and revenue leaders rarely have a charting problem. They have three versions of revenue, a close pack that still starts in a workbook, and a folder of reports nobody can explain. Power BI is useful when those reports share one semantic model, one set of measures, and one rule for who sees which rows.
The model has to match how the business already talks: bookings, recognized revenue, margin, pipeline, and the forecast. A new visual on a private copy of the data does not settle the meeting. We use Power BI for the reports people open, and we retire the ones that only add another number to reconcile.
The monthly pack is often a Power BI report, a spreadsheet, and slides copied from last month. A total moves and nobody can say whether the ledger, a filter, or a local edit caused it. Leadership stops trusting the report, and the next close gets slower. The fix is a measure that can be checked against the system of record, not a new color on the chart.
Sales reviews pipeline and bookings. Finance reviews recognized revenue. Both figures get labeled revenue, and neither owner can show the rule that separates them. Power BI can hold both measures in one model. It cannot invent the rule. That decision belongs to the people who sign the number, and it has to be written down before more reports are published.
Workspaces fill up with personal copies. A region lead saves a version, changes a filter, and forwards it. The original still refreshes. The copy does not. We separate draft work from the app leadership opens, and we name an owner for each published report so a Monday meeting is not reading last quarter's file.
A revenue leader needs the company total. A region lead should see their accounts and not everyone else's. Row-level security in the semantic model does that when the rule matches the hierarchy in the CRM or the ledger. A filter pasted onto one visual does not. We put the rule in the model and test it with a finance role and a region role before anyone relies on it.
Hypothetical example. A finance team keeps a weekly revenue bridge in a workbook because the Power BI report and the ledger disagree on credits. In this made-up week, bookings include a credit memo that sales has already removed and finance has not. The useful first step is to write the rule for credits, then check one week of totals against the ledger. Restyling the chart does not close the gap.
You leave with a model and a small set of reports finance and revenue can defend, plus the notes a new analyst would need. We do not hand over a gallery of visuals with the definitions still trapped in someone's head.
Bookings, revenue, margin, and the other figures you choose live as measures in one model. A short guide says what each measure includes, what it excludes, and which system it should match. Authors stop rebuilding the same calculation in every report.
Usually a finance pack and a revenue review, not a report for every request that arrived this year. Paginated layouts are in scope when finance still needs a fixed pack to export. Interactive reports are in scope when people need to filter without breaking the total.
Who can open the app, and which rows they see, is written down and tested. A region example and a finance example are part of handover, so a later change does not silently widen access.
The report shows when the numbers last updated, and someone owns what to do if that time is wrong on the morning of a meeting. Your team can keep it, or Managed Data Services can. The first handover includes the check either way.
A Free Assessment for Power BI looks at the report or pack you do not trust, the systems behind it, and the two or three definitions that cause the argument. We say whether the fix is a model change, a report cleanup, or a decision the business still has to make.
Bring the workbook or report leadership actually uses, and someone who can say what the number should mean. You leave knowing the first slice worth building and what can wait. We follow up within 2 business days.
No. We keep a report when the definition is right and the layout is the problem. We rebuild when the number itself cannot be tied to a system. Copying every existing visual into Power BI is a common way to import the disagreement.
Power BI is a strong place to show plan, forecast, and actual once those numbers exist. Writing a forecast back into a planning system is a separate product decision. If you need that, look at Power BI planning. A report visual is not a planning system.
Both can be in scope. Many engagements start with the report and the model, then connect the ledger, CRM, or billing system the total has to match. Data engineering is the related work when the refresh itself is why the number is late.
No. You keep your own Microsoft agreement. We design and build the models, reports, access, and handover. Naming Power BI is not a claim that we sell or administer your licenses.
Contact us for a Free Assessment. We'll follow up within 2 business days.
Contact Us